Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

The pesticide earthworm acute toxicity test is a standardized laboratory assay that measures the lethal effects of pesticide active ingredients and formulations on earthworms, the most widely accepted bioindicators of soil ecosystem health. Performed in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines such as OECD Test Guideline 207, ISO 11268-1, and GB/T 31270.15, the test determines the 14-day median lethal concentration (LC50) that is mandatory for pesticide registration and environmental risk assessment in most major jurisdictions.

Technical Overview

The earthworm acute toxicity test evaluates the short-term lethal hazard that a pesticide poses to soil-dwelling organisms. Earthworms are selected as the representative test organism because they constitute up to 80 percent of the terrestrial invertebrate biomass in agricultural soils and perform essential ecological functions, including soil aeration, organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and the formation of soil aggregates. Any pesticide applied directly to soil, whether as a granular broadcast, seed treatment, soil drench, or spray drift deposit, will inevitably come into contact with earthworms, making this test a cornerstone of terrestrial ecotoxicology.

The standard test species is Eisenia fetida (also known as Eisenia foetida, the red wiggler or tiger worm), an epigeic species that is easy to culture in the laboratory, has a well-documented sensitivity profile, and produces reproducible results across laboratories. During the test, adult worms are exposed to a series of pesticide concentrations incorporated into a defined artificial soil substrate for a period of 14 days. Mortality, visible abnormalities, and body weight changes are recorded, and the data are used to calculate the median lethal concentration (LC50) expressed in milligrams of active ingredient per kilogram of dry soil.

The test is a core data requirement for chemical pesticide registration in China under the GB/T 31270 series, in OECD member countries under OECD Test Guideline 207, and in international markets referencing ISO 11268-1. Accredited third-party laboratories and GLP-compliant testing facilities routinely conduct this assay to support regulatory submissions and environmental risk assessments.

Testing Standards

  • GB/T 31270.15-2014 — Test Guidelines on the Environmental Safety Assessment for Chemical Pesticides, Part 15: Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test
  • OECD Test Guideline 207 — Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests (filter paper contact test and artificial soil test)
  • ISO 11268-1 — Soil Quality: Effects of Pollutants on Earthworms, Part 1: Determination of Acute Toxicity to Eisenia fetida
  • OECD Test Guideline 222 — Earthworm Reproduction Test (often performed as a follow-up higher-tier study)

Testing Samples

Technical-Grade Active Ingredients

The pure or technical-grade active ingredient (TC) is the primary test substance for registration purposes. A certified reference standard or analytical-grade material with known purity, typically above 90 percent, is dosed directly into the artificial soil. The reported LC50 is corrected for the purity of the test substance and expressed as milligrams of active ingredient per kilogram of dry soil.

Pesticide Formulations

Commercial formulations such as emulsifiable concentrates (EC), suspension concentrates (SC), emulsions in water (EW), wettable powders (WP), water-dispersible granules (WG), granules (GR), and seed-treatment products may also be evaluated. Formulation testing is particularly relevant when co-formulants or carriers may modify the bioavailability and toxicity of the active ingredient under realistic field exposure conditions.

Metabolites and Degradation Products

Major transformation products of a pesticide that are persistent or are formed in significant quantities in soil can be screened with this test to complete the environmental fate and effect profile required by registration authorities.

Treated or Contaminated Soil Samples

Natural soil samples collected from pesticide-treated farmland, remediation sites, or spill areas can be assayed to characterize real-world exposure scenarios and verify site-specific ecological risk.

Testing Items

The core quantitative and qualitative endpoints of the earthworm acute toxicity test include:

  • 14-day median lethal concentration (LC50) with 95 percent confidence intervals, expressed as mg active ingredient per kg dry soil
  • Cumulative mortality at each test concentration on day 7 and day 14
  • Body weight change of surviving worms, calculated as the percentage difference between initial and final biomass
  • Behavioral and morphological observations, including lethargy, rigidity, lesions, excessive mucus secretion, discoloration, and avoidance of treated soil
  • No observed effect concentration (NOEC) and lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) for mortality, where the data permit
  • Concentration-response slope and statistical goodness-of-fit parameters
  • Toxicity classification grade according to the applicable regulatory scheme

Testing Methods

Test Organism Preparation

Adult Eisenia fetida at least two months old, with a well-developed clitellum and an individual wet weight between 300 and 600 milligrams, are selected from a healthy synchronized culture. Worms are acclimated in untreated artificial soil under test conditions for at least 24 hours before exposure, and any group showing more than 5 percent pre-test mortality is discarded.

Artificial Soil Substrate

The standard artificial soil prescribed by OECD 207, ISO 11268-1, and GB/T 31270.15 consists of 70 percent industrial quartz sand, 20 percent kaolinite clay with a kaolinite content above 30 percent, and 10 percent sphagnum peat finely ground and air-dried. The pH of the mixture is adjusted to 6.0 plus or minus 0.5 with analytical-grade calcium carbonate, and the moisture content is brought to 40 to 60 percent of the maximum water-holding capacity. This defined medium ensures inter-laboratory comparability and eliminates the variability inherent in natural field soils.

Range-Finding and Definitive Exposure

A preliminary range-finding test at widely spaced concentrations, such as 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 mg/kg dry soil, is first conducted to bracket the expected LC50. In the definitive test, at least five concentrations arranged in a geometric series with a separation factor not exceeding 2.2 are prepared, together with a negative control and, where required, a solvent control. The test substance is dissolved in a suitable carrier, mixed thoroughly with quartz sand, and then blended homogeneously into the pre-moistened artificial soil. Ten worms are placed on the surface of the treated soil in each test vessel and allowed to burrow naturally. Each concentration is tested with a minimum of three or four replicate vessels, depending on the guideline followed.

Incubation Conditions

Test vessels are incubated at 20 plus or minus 2 degrees Celsius under a controlled photoperiod, typically 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness or continuous illumination of 400 to 800 lux depending on the standard applied. Soil moisture is checked weekly and replenished with deionized water as needed. No food is added during the 14-day exposure period.

Observations and Data Recording

Mortality and clinical signs are recorded on day 7 and day 14. Worms are considered dead when they do not respond to gentle mechanical stimulation at the head region. Dead worms are removed upon detection. At test termination, surviving worms are gently hand-sorted from the soil, rinsed, blotted dry, and weighed after a brief overnight gut-content evacuation period to determine biomass change.

Validity Criteria

The test is considered valid when control mortality does not exceed 10 percent at day 14, the environmental conditions remain within the prescribed tolerances throughout the exposure, and the concentration-response relationship allows reliable statistical estimation of the LC50. Periodic verification with a reference toxicant, commonly 2-chloroacetamide with an expected LC50 in the range of approximately 10 to 30 mg/kg dry soil, is used to confirm the sensitivity of the worm culture and the consistency of the test system.

Statistical Analysis

The LC50 and its 95 percent confidence limits are calculated using probit analysis, logit regression, or other maximum-likelihood methods. If a full concentration-response model cannot be fitted, alternative approaches such as the moving average or the Spearman-Karber method may be applied. In cases where no mortality occurs at the highest concentration tested, the result is reported as an LC50 greater than that limit value.

Toxicity Classification

Under the classification scheme commonly applied in Chinese pesticide registration, the 14-day LC50 to earthworms is graded as follows:

  • LC50 less than or equal to 1 mg/kg dry soil — extremely toxic to earthworms
  • LC50 greater than 1 and less than or equal to 10 mg/kg dry soil — highly toxic
  • LC50 greater than 10 and less than or equal to 100 mg/kg dry soil — moderately toxic
  • LC50 greater than 100 mg/kg dry soil — slightly toxic

The resulting grade feeds directly into the terrestrial compartment of the pesticide environmental risk assessment, where the predicted environmental concentration in soil is compared against appropriate toxicity endpoints to derive a risk quotient.

Applications

  • Regulatory data generation for new chemical pesticide registration and re-registration in China and export markets
  • Tier-one terrestrial ecotoxicological screening in environmental risk assessment frameworks
  • Hazard classification, labeling, and safety data sheet preparation for pesticide products
  • Comparative sensitivity assessment during formulation optimization and active-ingredient screening in product development
  • Evaluation of soil remediation outcomes and post-application ecological monitoring at treated sites
  • Scientific research on the soil ecotoxicology of pesticides, adjuvants, and their degradation products

FAQ

Why is Eisenia fetida used as the standard test species?

Eisenia fetida is specified by OECD 207, ISO 11268-1, and GB/T 31270.15 because it is easy to culture year-round, has a short generation time, tolerates laboratory handling well, and possesses an extensive historical toxicity database that enables result comparison across substances and laboratories.

How long does the test take to complete?

The definitive exposure lasts 14 days. Including worm acclimation, range-finding screening, and statistical reporting, a complete study is typically finalized within four to six weeks.

What is the difference between the filter paper contact test and the artificial soil test?

The filter paper contact test is a short 48-hour screening exposure in which worms contact a pesticide residue deposited on filter paper; it provides a rapid indication of relative toxicity. The artificial soil test is the preferred regulatory method because it approximates natural exposure through soil, and it is the basis for the 14-day LC50 used in registration decisions.

What acceptance criteria must the test meet?

Control mortality must not exceed 10 percent by day 14, incubation temperature must remain at 20 plus or minus 2 degrees Celsius, soil moisture must stay within 40 to 60 percent of the water-holding capacity, and the worm batch must pass sensitivity verification against the reference toxicant when applicable.

When is a higher-tier study required?

If the acute LC50 approaches or falls below the predicted environmental concentration in soil, registration authorities may request a chronic reproduction study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 222 or ISO 11268-2 to refine the risk characterization for long-term exposures.